Radiometric dating assumptions Sex chats latvija free online

Radiometric dating assumptions

If we reverse the process to find the age of an alleged rock, the geologist takes his rock to the paleontologist, and the paleontologist goes to the same exact chart and looks for the “index fossil(s)” that normally are found in those rock layers.Henry Morris as follows: “Index fossils” are types of fossil (such as ammonites and coelacanths) that 19th century European evolutionists of the Victorian era claimed lived and died out many millions of years ago.This is despite the fact that it causes more problems for interpreting rock strata than it solves.

It cannot normally be used for sedimentary rocks (where fossils are typically found) like limestone and sandstone.

These long time periods are computed by measuring the ratio of daughter to parent substance in a rock, and inferring an age based on this global Flood of 2,348 BC) as global catastrophes reset all the radiometric/atomic “clocks” by invalidating the evolutionist’s main dating assumption that there have never been any global catastrophes.

The assumptions are similar to the assumptions used in carbon dating.

Carbon dating cannot be used on most fossils, not only because they are almost always allegedly too old, but also because they rarely contain the original carbon of the organism that has been fossilized.

Also, many fossils are contaminated with carbon from the environment during collection or preservation procedures.

radiometric dating assumptions-71radiometric dating assumptions-6radiometric dating assumptions-63

This runs counter to evolutionary estimates of 300 million years for granite to form.

Join our conversation (12 Comments).
Click Here To Leave Your Comment Radiometric dating assumptions.

Comments:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *